|team types' is any more efficient or effective than any other.īelbin's (1981) BTRSPI first appeared in his frequently Importantly, and ironically, it provides no evidence that any one mix of Questionnaire (to confirm the classificatory/taxonomic scheme) nor anyĮvidence of the predictive or construct validity of the test. To be little or no evidence of the factorial structure of the While McCann & Margerison's questionnaire has norms andĮvidence of internal reliability and concurrent validity there appears
The Myers-Briggs Type Inventory test (Myers & McCaulley, 1985). Have also developed a team-role measure which also has eight types andĪppears to be heavily influenced by the Jungian theories developed in Belbins, however, is not the only measureĪttempting to assess team-role behaviour. (Hogg, 1990) but has received comparatively little psychometricĪssessment or validation. This measure is used extensively in applied settingsĮspecially in selecting, counselling and developing management teams Properties of one such measure: the Belbin Team-role Self-perception This study aimed to examine, quite specifically, the psychometric Psychometrically valid measures of how people behave in teams. Reliable, team-dependent outcome variables in order to establish someĬriterion of team success. The extreme difficulty in measuring salient, ecologically valid and To be little empirical evidence to support various theories because of Various case studies (Adair, 1986 Handy, 1985). Much of the work in this field is descriptive and based on Teams, the way in which they function and the consequences of their There is a considerable literature on the creation of occupational
Predicted and the factor structure unclear. Again alpha levels were low, intercorrelations not as With the original ipsative scoring system using full-time managers as A third experiment used the original scale Significantly with a large number of demographic factors any more than The alpha coefficients were modest and the factor analysis suggested a The secondĮxperiment attempted a similar nonipsative analysis with the more recentħ0-item version of the questionnaire which has nine team roles. The alphaĬoefficients for the eight roles were not impressive and factor analysisĭid not provide clear evidence of the proposed structure. Of backgrounds in a non-ipsative Likert scaling form.
Original 56-item inventory was given to over 100 people from a variety Self-perception Inventory which examines how people behave in teams. This paper set out to examine the psychometric properties of theĮxtensively used, but little tested, Belbin (1981) Team-Role
APA style: A psychometric assessment of the Belbin Team-Role Self-Perception Inventory.A psychometric assessment of the Belbin Team-Role Self-Perception Inventory." Retrieved from 1993 British Psychological Society 09 Mar. MLA style: "A psychometric assessment of the Belbin Team-Role Self-Perception Inventory." The Free Library.
0 kommentar(er)
